Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (). Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, Daneman and Carpenter () developed a measure of WM capacity which required both processing and storage in WM. The task was really two tasks. Daneman and Carpenter (, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, –) developed a measure of working memory capacity, the reading.

Author: Tum Juran
Country: Uruguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 8 January 2018
Pages: 55
PDF File Size: 20.36 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.20 Mb
ISBN: 688-7-95483-186-1
Downloads: 67248
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shaktiran

Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: A twin study of middle-aged men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: In the second study, a variant of another attention control test, the Stroop task, was applied, which minimized the load on carpeenter, and no significant contribution of this task to Gf was found.

Reading span task

Learning, Memory, and Cognition16— Memory 19800 Reading process. Discourse Processes14— Working memory capacity and the use of inferences in text comprehension. Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


An evaluation using Japanese raneman of reading span test. Languages Magyar Edit links. Japanese Journal of Psychology7151— Besides the “listening span” variant also developed by Daneman and Carpenter, [1] several variants have been developed in recent years based upon the RST. Brain and Cognition451— Thus, when contribution of control and capacity were unconfounded, attention control mechanisms of WM contributed to fluid intelligence to a lesser extent than did the mechanisms related to the active buffer of WM.

Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, The reading span task was the first instance of the family of “complex span” tasks as opposed to “simple span” tasks.

Reading span task – Wikipedia

This study tested which of two crucial mechanisms of working memory WM: The original RST required participants to read series of unconnected sentences aloud and to remember the final word carpemter each sentence of a series grouped according to the total number of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior19 4 This page was last edited on 21 Juneat European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

Retrieved from ” https: In the first study, the antisaccade task was used, the standard measure of attention control, in a modified variant which resulted in scores less sensitive to individual differences in the active buffer capacity, in comparison to the standard variant.


Individual differences in working memory and reading. Working memory and language comprehension: Working Memory and Reading Development.

Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. Scientific Research An Academic Publisher.

Later research corroborated the finding that reading span is more closely related to language comprehension than word span. With each sentence presented on a card, participants were cued to recall the memorized end-of-sentence words in their original order by a blank card at the end of a series. The number of sentences of a series was incrementally increased until a participant’s reading anx, or the maximum number of final words correctly recalled, was found.

In a twin study of middle-aged men, a ahd rating of. Effect of concreteness of target word on verbal working memory: